APM Lens Presentation

March 18th, 2011

Jane Royden
Posted by Jane Royden in APM, E AND H, Project Management, Uncategorized, coaching

Last Monday I joined my APM People SIG colleague Rob Sadler to deliver a presentation to the Coventry Branch of lenscollective the APM, about the new Lens Collective - A guide to seeing different perspectives in project management.  Read more at: http://www.apm.org.uk/news/lens-collective and http://www.apm.org.uk/blog/it-me

Transformation Reality Check

February 21st, 2011

Jane Royden
Posted by Jane Royden in E AND H, Project Management, Transformation, Transformation Reality Check

We have recently established a major transformation programme with the London Borough of Havering that will deliver £20 million in annual revenue savings for the Council.  Cheryl Coppell - Chief Executive, London Borough of Havering said:

 

“E AND H has worked with Havering to initiate a solution that has meant we are now ‘ahead of the game’, they have enabled us to shift the blockages and get things moving so we can now see a clear way forward “

Since working with Havering we have developed the Transformation Reality Check, an independent review that could help you speed up, reduce the costs, and maximise the impact of your transformation programmeContact us for more information.

 

 

 

 

 

Viral Change™

February 10th, 2011

Jane Royden
Posted by Jane Royden in Viral Change

Is the alternative to slow, painful and unsuccessful management of change in organisations.  As an Associated Practice, E AND H are now accredited to conduct Viral Change™ programmes in conjunction with Viral Change LLP and The Chalfont Project. 

In Viral Change™, a small set of behaviours spread by a small number of people through their networks of influence create massive behavioural tipping points, translated into new routines and ‘cultures’ (new ideas established, new ways of working, new process adoption, new culture). Viral Change is about creating an internal epidemic of success in whatever way you have pre-defined success. viralchange_logo3

http://viralchange.com/

Is the Project Management Profession Relevant for UK Plc?

October 8th, 2010

David Hart
Posted by David Hart in E AND H, Project Management

I’ve recently been nominated for election to the Board of the UK Association for Project Management (APM).  There is a discussion forum on the new APM website where members can ask questions of the candidates (http://www.apm5dimensions.com/group/apm-board-election-2010).

We were recently asked a very incisive question about the relevence of the profession and the APM in today’s world:

I’m fairly new to the APM and my perception is of an organisation and a profession ready to make a step change in how it demonstrates ‘relevance’ for UK PLC.  Do you share this view and if so, what does that mean needs to happen?

My answer was: No – and Yes.

The APM is already demonstrating real relevance, and has credibility, in its role in developing the knowledge, expertise and competence of practitioners.  The qualifications framework and move towards Chartered/Professional status provide a broad-based approach for developing the skills and expertise that the UK needs – and this is now widely recognised, even in sectors that perhaps don’t have a traditional project management culture.  We are at last demonstrating to a wider audience that effective project management is much more than just process or methodology.

However, the APM also has a more strategic aspect to its mission, which is more about where and how the profession (and the disciplines we espouse) can actually contribute most benefit for, as you put it, UK Plc.

It is this second area, the ‘strategic fit’ of our profession within the wider environment, where I think we perhaps do need to look again at where we are going, and maybe a step change is needed.  The benefits of effective project, programme and portfolio management (PPPM) approaches often aren’t appreciated by senior executives – and recognised change experts are still saying that taking a PPPM approach to organisational change often adds no value.  I’m not sure what the answer to this is, but what needs to happen within the APM initially is a debate about what we are here for and where we should be positioning ourselves to best deliver the public benefit set out in our mission statement.  Are we just about the development of technical and professional skills – i.e. in project management – or are we actually about enabling organisations to deliver effective and beneficial change?

It would be interesting to hear what others think.

Project-Facing or Customer-Facing?

October 5th, 2010

David Hart
Posted by David Hart in E AND H, Project Management, Rant

The phrase ‘becoming a project-facing organisation’ seems to me to be appearing in discussions across the project management community with increasing frequency.   Also, and perhaps associated with this, the focus on the importance of portfolio management has generated a perception in some circles that there should be a structured hierarchy in a project-facing organisation, where a project manager reports to a programme manager, who in turn reports to a more senior portfolio manager.  Why does this worry me?

I suppose the main reason is my uneasiness about the concept that an organisation should be ‘project-facing’.  My experience from both project and operational management has been that organisations need to be customer-facing, and that once we lose our focus on the customer things can begin to go wrong.  For example, few would argue that effective financial control isn’t vital – but what would we think of an organisation that was described as ‘accountancy-facing’?  Yes, there are obviously organisations that need to be project-focussed where projects are the core of the business – construction for instance – but should an organisation whose business is about operational service delivery or process improvement be project-facing?  An argument often made is that we live in a rapidly changing world and that projects are the means of delivering strategy and the changes needed to keep us competitive.  Is this necessarily about making an organisation project-facing and structuring it in a portfolio/programme/project (PPPM) way, or is it really about ensuring organisations have the capability and are agile enough to respond effectively to changing customer needs and environmental influences?   Are we in danger of putting too rigid a framework around what we feel is good PPPM and not taking a wider contextual and ‘systems thinking’ approach to change?  Organisations need to possess the project management skills and capabilities needed to deliver change, and more importantly they need to know how and when to use them.  Isn’t it a key responsibility of our profession to develop the science (or art) of PPPM and Change management in a way that contributes to organisational effectiveness and adds real value for the customers, consumers and shareholders?  To lose our focus on the customer risks a resurgence of the negative aspects of ‘professionalism’ that we’ve sometimes seen in the past in other areas.